Skip to main content

Netanyahu’s War Games and the Echoes of Iraq: How False Flags and Propaganda are Driving the Region to the Brink

 By Zohaib Ahmed | Analysis | The New World Disorder


Introduction: History Is Not Repeating, It's Copy-Pasting

In April 2003, as Baghdad fell to American tanks and global media scrambled for "weapons of mass destruction" (WMDs), a lie was born—one that would destroy Iraq and define a generation of war. Today, the ghost of that lie is being resurrected. Its new target? Iran. And its eventual destination? Pakistan.

This time, the architect is not Ahmed Chalabi—the infamous Iraqi fraudster who sold America a war—but Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, and perhaps the most dangerous manipulator in modern Middle Eastern geopolitics.


Israel’s Latest Lie: “Pakistan is Arming Iran”

In a disturbing twist, Israeli state-linked sources are now floating a provocative narrative: Pakistan is allegedly supplying Iran with ballistic missiles. This fabrication has no basis in verifiable evidence, yet its implications are explosive—pun intended.

Let’s be clear: this is not an intelligence leak; it’s a provocation.
It’s Tel Aviv baiting Islamabad into a strategic blunder.
But Pakistan won’t bite.
Because if war comes, the world won’t just witness a regional conflict—it will watch the live demolition of a genocidal apartheid state.


From Chalabi to Netanyahu: Same Lies, New Targets

Let’s rewind to 2003. I entered Iraq through Jordan as a journalist, part of Geo News’ early coverage team. At Baghdad’s infamous Palestine Hotel, I interviewed a U.S. Army officer and asked the burning question:
“Have you found Saddam’s chemical and nuclear weapons?”
He said no—but claimed they’d be found “soon.”

At that moment, legendary British journalist Robert Fisk leaned over and whispered something unforgettable:

“You’ll never find them. The WMDs don’t exist. It’s a con.”

He was right.
And the man behind that con? Ahmed Chalabi, a Western-educated opportunist who spoke fluent English and knew how to sell a war.
Fisk once called him:

The Iraqi version of Benjamin Netanyahu.

Why? Because like Netanyahu, Chalabi weaponized Western gullibility, used fake intelligence, and rode American power into Iraq’s oil ministry—and later, the deputy prime minister’s chair. When it turned out he was also secretly liaising with Iran, the Americans dropped him. Too late. Iraq had already bled.


The Netanyahu Doctrine: Make the Lie Big, Make It Loud

Benjamin Netanyahu’s entire political career has been built on fear-mongering, manipulation, and deception.
In September 2002, he stood before the U.S. Congress and swore:

“Saddam has WMDs. The world must act.”

It was a lie. But it worked.
Fast-forward to 2024–25, and Netanyahu is running the same playbook.
Only now, it’s Iran’s nuclear program that he’s fear-mongering about—and Pakistan is the newly inserted villain in the script.


The Real Agenda: Greater Israel and American Blood

To understand Netanyahu, you must understand his family ideology.
His father, Benzion Netanyahu, was a staunch Zionist and historian who believed in Greater Israel—a biblical empire stretching across Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, and parts of Egypt.
His grandfather, Milikovsky Netanyahu, was a Russian Jewish rabbi who arrived in Jerusalem in 1924 and helped fuel the Zionist project.

Benjamin, raised in Jerusalem and educated at Harvard, has always seen himself as the guardian of this dream.
He fought in the 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars, was wounded in action, and vowed never to let Israel appear weak again.

This ideology fuels his actions. Every Israeli strike on Syria, every assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist, and every cyberattack on Natanz is not just strategy—it’s theology fused with military doctrine.


Iran vs Israel: The Turning Point

When Israel launched its preemptive strike on Iran in June 2025—just two days before the final round of U.S.-Iran talks in Muscat—it was no coincidence. Netanyahu had no interest in peace.
He needed war.

The assassination of senior IRGC commanders was intended to humiliate Iran. But what followed was a shock even to Israel’s hardened defense establishment:

Iran launched a direct missile strike on Israeli military infrastructure.
No proxy. No ambiguity. Just fire and fury.

Yes, Iran suffered losses—but its missiles shattered Israel’s myth of invincibility.
The symbolic defeat was more powerful than the physical damage.

The Spark: Israel’s Strike and Iran’s Immediate Response

On June 13, 2025, Israel launched a massive air raid targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities in Natanz and military assets in Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, Arak, and Kermanshah. The strike, involving 200 jets and 100 targets, aimed to cripple Iran’s leadership by killing top IRGC officials and nuclear scientists. Prime Minister Netanyahu invoked the pretext of preventing Iran’s nuclear breakout, echoing the discredited Iraq WMD narrative of 2002.

Iran's Operation True Promise 3 was unleashed within hours. Over 100 Shahed drones and another 100+ ballistic missiles—potentially including hypersonics—slammed into Israeli targets. The most significant strike hit Tel Aviv and the HaKirya military command, shaking Israel's sense of security. Despite Tel Aviv's claims of intercepting most projectiles, fatalities, injuries, and national panic told a different story.


Why Operation True Promise 3 Was a Strategic Masterstroke

1. Tactical and Psychological Penetration: Iran’s ability to strike HaKirya, the heart of Israel’s military command, shattered psychological barriers. Israeli social media was ablaze with fear: “If they hit HaKirya, Tel Aviv is next.” Even minimal structural damage inflicted maximum psychological disruption.

2. Overloading Israel’s Defenses: While Israel claimed a 90% interception rate, the attack overwhelmed Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow-3. The sheer volume of Iranian missiles highlighted critical defense gaps. IRGC’s Hajizadeh warned: “This is just phase one.” Iran’s Aerospace Force, intact and agile despite leadership losses, maintained operational continuity under newly appointed Commander Mohammad Pakpour.

3. Global and Domestic Messaging: Khamenei declared the strike a warning to Israel’s arrogance. State-backed media showcased mass rallies in Tehran, countering Western narratives of domestic unrest. Regionally, Iran's defiance resonated, earning measured support from Russia, China, and even tacit sympathy from Arab states like Saudi Arabia and Qatar.


Israel’s Blunders: The Cracks in Rising Lion

1. Misreading Iran's Resolve: Israel assumed leadership decapitation would paralyze Iran. Instead, it triggered a rapid, coordinated retaliation. Mossad’s intelligence assumptions failed spectacularly.

2. Air Defense Overload: Despite U.S. and Jordanian assistance, Iranian missiles penetrated Israeli skies. Iron Dome was mocked as “Iron Sieve” across social media.

3. Diplomatic Fallout: By simultaneously striking Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza, Israel isolated itself. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister labeled the campaign a "war crime." Saudi and Qatari statements condemned the aggression.

4. Netanyahu’s Panic: Unverified reports of Netanyahu being rushed to safety amid air raid sirens undermined his leadership image. His claims that Iran lost a third of its launch capability were promptly denied by the IRGC.


Desperation Diplomacy: The Pakistan Smokescreen

In a bizarre twist, Israel accused Pakistan of supplying Iran with missiles. Pakistani officials, including FM Ishaq Dar and PM Shehbaz Sharif, dismissed the claim as a “Zionist hallucination.”

The allegation mirrors Netanyahu’s infamous Iraq WMD rhetoric, recycled from the Ahmed Chalabi playbook. The motive is clear: drag the U.S. into a broader war by inventing a Pakistani-Iranian military nexus. But Pakistan’s nuclear status and diplomatic gravitas make this gamble dangerous.

While no evidence supports direct military transfers, Pakistan’s moral and diplomatic backing of Iran is clear. Senate resolutions and global media support highlight Islamabad’s alignment against Zionist aggression—but its military posture remains focused on India, not Israel.


Looking Ahead: Iran’s Next Moves & Regional Stakes

Phase Two Options for Iran:

  • Disable Israeli Air Defenses: Using anti-radiation missiles or cyber warfare.

  • Open a Jordanian Corridor: Dismantling regional defenses to strike deeper via Iraq/Syria.

  • Proxy Strikes: Mobilizing Houthis or Iraqi militias to stretch Israeli and U.S. forces.

  • Economic Disruption: Mining the Strait of Hormuz to spike oil prices and punish Western economies.

Wider Implications:

  • U.S. Entrapment: With Trump hinting at intervention, Israel hopes to drag America in.

  • Arab Fracture Lines: Jordan’s aid to Israel in drone defense has drawn backlash.

  • Global Oil Shock: Prices have surged 7% since the conflict began. Iran’s refineries remain untouched, giving it economic leverage.


Strategic Scorecard: Iran Rising, Israel Reeling

Iran's Wins:

  • Operational resilience after leadership losses.

  • Advanced missile capabilities, including suspected hypersonics.

  • Regional and international support from Muslim nations and great powers.

  • Nuclear ambiguity preserved (IAEA confirms no further damage at Natanz).

Israel’s Losses:

  • Intelligence failure on Iran’s capabilities.

  • Breached air defenses.

  • Diplomatic isolation.

  • Netanyahu’s credibility collapsing amid baseless accusations.


A Global Realignment: Who’s With Whom?

In the wake of the Israeli assault, the Islamic world took stock.
To Tel Aviv’s dismay, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and most of the Arab world refused to condemn Iran.
Even Turkey and Qatar offered soft backing.

This wasn’t just a geopolitical alignment. It was a moral one.
Muslim nations may have their differences—but on the issue of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its provocations in Iran, there is unity.


Why Pakistan Must Stay Calm, But Prepared

Tel Aviv's allegation that Pakistan is supplying Iran with missiles is designed to:

  1. Shift international focus from Israel’s aggression and war crimes.

  2. Frame Pakistan as a rogue nuclear actor.

  3. Invite Western sanctions or retaliation.

  4. Force Pakistan into a corner where it must respond.

But here’s the catch: Pakistan has nothing to gain and everything to lose by taking the bait.
It must stay calm—but not naïve.

Because if Netanyahu thinks Pakistan is Iraq, he’s dead wrong.

Unlike Iraq in 2003 or even Iran today, Pakistan is a nuclear-armed, battle-tested state with a hardened military, strategic alliances with China and Turkey, and extensive asymmetric capabilities.


Robert Fisk’s Prophecy Lives On

Before his death, Fisk warned:

“Netanyahu will do to Iran what Chalabi did to Iraq—only this time the cost will be even greater.”

He saw what most mainstream media missed. He understood that behind Netanyahu’s polished American accent and Harvard education lies the same old colonial ambition:
use America’s military for Israel’s religious empire.


Conclusion: The Lie Has Been Exposed, Again

In 2003, the lie was WMDs in Iraq.
In 2025, the lie is Pakistani missiles in Iran.
Same tactics. Same actors. Only this time, the region is wiser—and angrier.

If Netanyahu succeeds in dragging America into another endless war, the consequences will be catastrophic.
And if Israel attacks Pakistan directly or indirectly, it won’t be a “surgical strike”—

It will be the beginning of Israel’s own unraveling.


Bonus: What the Data Tells Us

  • Israel’s claim: “We destroyed one-third of Iran’s launchers.”
    ❌ Disproven by IAEA inspections and satellite data.

  • Iran’s response: Over 100 ballistic missiles launched.
    ✅ Confirmed impact on multiple Israeli air bases.

  • Muslim world sentiment: 68% support Iran’s right to self-defense. (Al Jazeera survey)

  • Pakistan’s stance: Denies any involvement; urges de-escalation but keeps military on alert.


Final Word:

"If Israel defeats Iran today, its next target will be Pakistan. Because Modi and Netanyahu are two faces of the same fascist coin."

Remember the name Ahmed Chalabi, because in the next war, he will look a lot like Benjamin Netanyahu.

And remember what happens when the world believes a lie too long.
Sometimes, history doesn’t forgive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The New World Order Unveiled: A Game-Changing Analysis of Global Chess Moves

  Subtitle: A ruthless exposé of war crimes, peace pacts, betrayal, rebirth, and Pakistan’s unexpected rise to global superstardom. “History is not written by the victors anymore. It’s ghostwritten by strategists with nukes, oil, and media dominance. Welcome to the New World Disorder .” INTRO: The Theatre of Power Has a New Script The world is not merely evolving—it is burning, bending, and being rebuilt . The old guard of geopolitics lies shattered like the ruins of Gaza’s skyline. The new architects? A former reality TV star turned president, a kingdom looking to dominate the Islamic world, and a South Asian nation once written off as a “failed state” now punching like a superpower. In 2025, the New World Order is no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s breaking news —engineered in backdoor meetings, airbase corridors, and underground bunkers. What’s being constructed is not peace , but a highly calculated, oil-greased, war-scarred New World Disorder . The world stands at a...

The Kalabagh Dam: Debunking the Myths & Exposing the real blockers!

The Kalabagh Dam (KBD) is a proposed hydroelectric dam on the Indus River in the Mianwali District of Punjab, Pakistan, first conceptualized in the 1950s. It has been touted as a transformative infrastructure project to address Pakistan’s chronic water scarcity, energy shortages, and flood risks. However, despite extensive feasibility studies and technical endorsements, the project remains stalled due to deep-seated political opposition and inter-provincial disputes. Below, I provide a detailed analysis of the project’s potential benefits, its politicization, and whether systemic issues underpin its challenges, supported by data, statistics, and statements from relevant sources. Why the Kalabagh Dam is Considered a Great Project The Kalabagh Dam is designed to address three critical challenges facing Pakistan: water scarcity, energy shortages, and flood vulnerability. Its proponents argue that it offers substantial economic, agricultural, and environmental benefits, backed by decade...

Pakistan vs. Israel? One Mistake Away from a War Tel Aviv Can’t Win

Unveiling Israel’s Information Warfare: The Psy-Ops Targeting Pakistan’s Ballistic Missiles By Zohaib Ahmed, Founder – The New World Disorder In the ever-evolving theatre of Middle Eastern geopolitics, wars are no longer just about boots on the ground or drones in the sky—they’re also fought with tweets, fake news, and weaponized narratives. In 2025, amid the flaring tensions between Israel and Iran, a dangerous subplot is unfolding: the deliberate vilification of Pakistan through sophisticated information warfare tactics. The target? Pakistan’s ballistic missile program. The method? Disinformation seeded into the digital bloodstream of global discourse. Recent claims originating from Israeli-aligned digital ecosystems suggest that Pakistan is supplying ballistic missiles to Iran—a narrative that, while lacking credible evidence, has found unsettling traction on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This blog decodes the psychological and strategic layers behind this propaganda camp...