Unveiling Israel’s Information Warfare: The Psy-Ops Targeting Pakistan’s Ballistic Missiles
By Zohaib Ahmed, Founder – The New World Disorder
In the ever-evolving theatre of Middle Eastern geopolitics, wars are no longer just about boots on the ground or drones in the sky—they’re also fought with tweets, fake news, and weaponized narratives. In 2025, amid the flaring tensions between Israel and Iran, a dangerous subplot is unfolding: the deliberate vilification of Pakistan through sophisticated information warfare tactics. The target? Pakistan’s ballistic missile program. The method? Disinformation seeded into the digital bloodstream of global discourse.
Recent claims originating from Israeli-aligned digital ecosystems suggest that Pakistan is supplying ballistic missiles to Iran—a narrative that, while lacking credible evidence, has found unsettling traction on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This blog decodes the psychological and strategic layers behind this propaganda campaign, dissects its geopolitical motives, and presents a clear-eyed view of what’s really at play—and at stake—for Pakistan.
Act I: The Disinformation—A Manufactured Missile Myth
The central lie pushed by Israeli-aligned narratives is that Pakistan is providing Iran with ballistic missile technology or ready-to-fire systems. These claims have largely been amplified by anonymous accounts masquerading as Iranian insiders—most of which sprung up almost overnight—and recycled through fringe digital outlets known for their connections to Israeli or Indian interests.
But here's the catch: Iran doesn’t need Pakistan’s missiles.
Iran’s missile program is one of the most self-reliant and diversified in the world. From the Khorramshahr and Shahab series to cutting-edge hypersonics like the Fattah-2, Tehran has built a stockpile that allows it to strike anywhere in Israel—and beyond. According to multiple independent assessments, Iran can sustain medium-intensity missile operations for several weeks without exhausting its resources.
So why invent the Pakistan angle?
Because it serves a much bigger agenda.
Act II: Why Pakistan? Understanding the Calculus
From a strategic standpoint, Pakistan is an odd choice for an alleged missile partner in this conflict. Here’s why that accusation fails under rational analysis:
- Diplomatic Balance: Pakistan is cautiously managing a thaw with India. An overt entanglement in a Middle Eastern conflict would jeopardize this fragile equilibrium.
- Turbulent Ties with Iran: Far from being steadfast allies, Pakistan and Iran have had their share of friction—from cross-border militancy to regional rivalry.
- U.S. Oversight: The Iranian border is among the most surveilled zones on Earth. If Pakistan were funneling missiles to Iran, Washington would’ve made a spectacle of it. The silence from Langley speaks volumes.
In other words, the theory doesn’t fly—which is exactly what makes it so dangerous. Because in the realm of information warfare, truth is often irrelevant; perception is power.
Act III: The Strategy Behind the Smokescreen
Let’s peel the layers.
Israel is engaged in a multi-front strategy that includes kinetic operations, cyberattacks, covert sabotage, and, now, information warfare. Here’s how the Pakistan narrative fits in:
-
Ballistic Distraction: By painting Pakistan as a co-belligerent, Israel attempts to justify future air corridor expansion into eastern Iran—closer to the Pakistan border—under the guise of eliminating external missile threats.
-
Digital Destabilization: Disinformation creates internal anxiety within Pakistan and external mistrust among its partners. It’s a classic destabilization playbook lifted straight from Cold War-era psychological operations.
-
India-Israel Echo Chamber: This narrative isn't being pushed in isolation. Dozens of Indian accounts, some state-linked, are echoing the Israeli narrative in lockstep. The Indo-Israeli digital alliance is rapidly becoming one of the most potent soft power syndicates in South Asia—willing and able to shape global narratives, even if they're built on fiction.
Act IV: Iran’s Calculated Silence
An intriguing subplot is Iran’s muted response. Iranian media channels and diplomatic voices have not denied the narrative with full force. Why?
Because a lie that boosts deterrence isn’t always inconvenient.
Allowing the perception of Pakistan’s support—real or not—sends a message to Israel and its Western allies: we’re not alone. In the shadowy world of geopolitics, perception is half the battle. Tehran may be leveraging this myth to inflate its strategic weight, much like Saddam Hussein famously exaggerated Iraq’s WMD capabilities to deter external intervention.
Act V: Regional Fallout and Strategic Implications
So, what happens if this narrative continues to gain traction?
- Pressure on Pakistan’s Military Doctrine: Islamabad might face global pressure to “clarify” or “reassure” on its missile posture, particularly from the U.S. and Gulf partners wary of escalation.
- Airspace Provocations: We could see Israel floating the idea of preemptive strikes on supposed “launch platforms” in eastern Iran, dangerously close to Pakistani airspace—creating a new security dilemma for Rawalpindi.
- Diplomatic Rebalancing: If Israel’s campaign succeeds, it could isolate Pakistan diplomatically just as Islamabad is trying to diversify its alliances through proactive engagement in Africa, Central Asia, and the Gulf.
Zohaib Ahmed’s Final Analysis: Beyond the Noise
This isn’t just a story about missiles or fake tweets. It’s a glimpse into the future of modern warfare—one where wars of perception precede wars of precision.
Israel’s campaign against Pakistan is a deliberate, digitally curated attempt to redraw the narrative battlefield. It weaponizes ambiguity, amplifies paranoia, and targets the trust between nations. And it reveals a deeper truth: that the next generation of statecraft won’t be fought just with fighter jets or nukes—it will be fought with misinformation, algorithms, and digital psy-ops.
Pakistan must recognize this shift and adapt. This is not a traditional war, but it is war nonetheless. The state must invest in strategic communication, AI-powered information countermeasures, and a full-spectrum digital doctrine to shield itself from narrative sabotage. Silence, in today’s info-war environment, is not neutrality—it’s surrender.
As the Middle East teeters on the brink and global alliances shift like tectonic plates, Pakistan’s most potent weapon may not be a missile—but its message.
Pakistan Is Not Just Ready—It’s Waiting
Let’s be clear: Pakistan is not some helpless spectator to be bullied into submission by false flags and narrative warfare. If anything, Pakistan would welcome an Israeli miscalculation that attempts to cross its red lines—because such a move would bring the mask off. In a world already disgusted by Israel’s war crimes from Gaza to Rafah, Pakistan’s entry into the equation would mark the beginning of Israel’s geopolitical downfall. This is not 1948. Pakistan is a nuclear-armed state with battle-hardened forces, decades of asymmetric warfare experience, and a military doctrine evolved under the pressure of a much tougher rival: India. And make no mistake—if Pakistan can stand toe-to-toe with India, a larger, better-funded, and nuclear rival, Israel doesn’t even qualify as a worthy adversary. Should Tel Aviv cross that line, the world won’t just witness retaliation—it will witness a live, strategic humiliation of a genocidal regime that’s already isolated, paranoid, and morally bankrupt. The doctrine is clear, the assets are ready, and the will is stronger than ever. What Pakistan lacks in public threats, it compensates for in lethal capability and strategic clarity—and the world doesn’t just know it, it respects it.
Comments
Post a Comment