Skip to main content

China’s SpaceSail / Shanghai Spacecom Satellite Technology (SSST) coming to Pakistan.

 Prepared By: Zohaib Ahmed — Strategic brief

Date: 22 Oct 2025 

Executive summary

Shanghai Spacecom Satellite Technology (SSST), which markets its megaconstellation under names such as SpaceSail, Qianfan (Thousand Sails) and G60, is China’s most prominent state-backed commercial rival to SpaceX’s Starlink. Backed by Shanghai municipal authorities and national industrial funds, SSST has raised large state-linked capital and already launched multiple batches of LEO satellites. It targets global broadband and has announced ambitious plans (tens of thousands of satellites in some reporting) to scale rapidly through 2030. SSST has signalled interest in Pakistan and there are media reports (local outlets and social posts) claiming company registration activity; however, Pakistan’s national space/telecom regulators are still finalizing licensing rules for foreign LEO operators, so operational entry remains conditional on regulatory approvals.



Background & identity

  • Full Name: Shanghai Spacecom Satellite Technology Co., Ltd. (上海空间通信技术有限公司)

  • Brand Name: SpaceSail

  • Established: 2020

  • Headquarters: Shanghai, China

  • Key Backers: A consortium led by the Shanghai Municipal Government, with significant investment from state-owned aerospace and defense enterprises, including the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) ecosystem.

  • Primary Mission: To build, launch, and operate a global LEO satellite broadband internet constellation to provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity for consumer, enterprise, and government users.

Key product / technical features (what SpaceSail claims / aims to deliver)

  • LEO broadband constellation designed for low-latency, high-throughput internet comparable to commercial LEO offerings. Intended to serve residential, enterprise and government customers, plus IoT/mobile backhaul. IEEE Spectrum

  • Massive scale ambition: various company and media figures have circulated targets ranging from ~600–15,000 satellites by 2027–2030, and some sensational local reports cite up to 30,000 satellites by 2030. The most consistently reported technical plan positions SpaceSail in the many thousands range (eg. 10k–15k) to achieve near-global coverage. (Note: published targets differ by source — see "Current status" for actual launches.) spaceanddefense.io

  • Phased deployment approach: small initial batches for testing and demonstration, then rapid scale-up using domestic launchers (Long March family) and commercial launch partners. Multiple small-satellite batches already launched. Reuters

  • Ground network & partnerships: SSST is pursuing MoUs and partnerships with regional operators (reports of deals/MoUs in Brazil, Malaysia, Kazakhstan) to access spectrum, gateway sites, and local market entry. Reuters

  • Security / features for state use: being state-backed, the constellation is expected to include secure government-access capabilities and will be positioned as a sovereign alternative to western systems (explicit in analysis and state media framing). Reuters

The proposed SpaceSail constellation is designed to be a state-of-the-art system, incorporating lessons learned from existing LEO networks.

FeatureDescription
Constellation ScalePlanned 12,992 satellites in initial phase (approved by ITU), with a long-term vision for up to 30,000.
OrbitLow Earth Orbit (LEO), likely across multiple orbital planes (inclinations) for comprehensive global coverage.
Communication BandsUser Links: Expected to use Ka/Ku-band for consumer terminals. Feeder Links: Q/V-band for high-throughput ground station communication.
LatencyTarget: <30ms. Comparable to terrestrial fiber and Starlink, enabling real-time applications (gaming, video conferencing, VoIP).
Download/Upload SpeedsProjected to offer speeds competitive with Starlink's current offerings (50-500 Mbps for residential users, with higher tiers for enterprise).
User TerminalPhased array antenna ("satellite dish"). A key focus is on cost reduction and mass production to compete on price.
Advanced FeaturesOptical Inter-Satellite Links (OISL): Lasers for satellite-to-satellite communication, reducing reliance on ground stations and improving latency over long distances.
Advanced Beamforming: Dynamic resource allocation to focus capacity on high-demand areas.
Seamless Integration with 5G/6G: Designed as a complementary technology to terrestrial networks.

Current status (as of latest public reporting)

  • Funding: Series A reported ~6.7bn CNY (~US$933–943M) led by state investment vehicles (Feb 2024). Reuters

  • Launches to date: China launched the earliest batches in 2024; reports in 2025–2025 vary but recent industry outlets report multiple launches and a cumulative satellite count in the low hundreds. SpaceDaily reported ~108 satellites across six rockets (recent), other outlets report ~72 or similar—figures are rising quickly as China executes batch launches. These are operationally early-stage satellites for testing and incremental service rollout. (Satellite count is changing rapidly; cite sources per paragraph.) Reuters spacedaily.com

  • Commercial traction & MoUs: SSST has signed MoUs/expressed cooperation with state operators abroad (Telebras in Brazil, MEASAT in Malaysia) and reportedly testing in countries such as Kazakhstan. Reuters

  • Pakistan linkage: Pakistani media (Dawn) reports SSST has expressed interest in operating in Pakistan alongside other LEO players; some local outlets and social posts claim a company registration in Pakistan. At the same time, Pakistan’s space/telecom regulator (PSARB/PTA) is still shaping licensing/spectrum policy and has not completed registration/licensing processes for LEO internet operators — meaning formal operation still awaits regulatory clearance. Dawn Minute Mirror


How SpaceSail (SSST) compares vs Starlink (SpaceX)

Ownership & governance

  • Starlink: privately owned by SpaceX (Elon Musk), U.S.-based with commercial/government customers internationally.

  • SpaceSail: state-backed (Shanghai municipal + national funds), positioned as a Chinese sovereign/commercial competitor with closer ties to state priorities (security, export diplomacy). Reuters

Scale & timeline

  • Starlink (2025–2026): ~5,000–6,000 satellites already deployed (operational service in many countries), aggressive but proven manufacturing & launch cadence.

  • SpaceSail: aims for thousands–tens of thousands (reported 10k–15k commonly, some local claims higher); currently in early deployment (hundreds of satellites), ramping up launches via Chinese launchers. Starlink currently has the real-world head start in service availability and user terminals. Reuters

Technology & user experience

  • Both use LEO architecture for low latency. Starlink benefits from mature user terminals, multi-generation satellites, global ground gateway network, and an established consumer brand. SpaceSail’s terminal ecosystems, pricing, and QoS guarantees remain emerging and will depend on local partnerships and certification. Reuters

Market positioning

  • Starlink—commercial-first with prominent military use in Ukraine and other conflicts (battlefield connectivity).

  • SpaceSail—commercial plus explicit national strategic objectives (sovereign availability, alternative to Western providers, potential integration with Chinese telecom and defense ecosystems). Reuters

Regulatory & geopolitical constraints

  • Starlink faces export controls and sensitive-country restrictions; SpaceSail may find quicker entry into markets aligned with Beijing, but may face scrutiny over data flows, encryption, and potential content controls in democracies. Many countries are evaluating security implications of Chinese LEO operators. Reuters


When is SpaceSail “coming” to Pakistan?

  • Short answer: SSST has publicly expressed interest and local media report company registration activity, but operational entry depends on Pakistan’s regulatory process. Pakistan’s PSARB/PTA has been drafting a licensing and spectrum framework for LEO operators; the draft, stakeholder consultations, and licensing fee structures are still being finalized (reports mid–late 2025). Until PSARB/PTA completes registration and issues operational licences, SpaceSail cannot begin commercial service in Pakistan. Timeline therefore is conditional: could be months to a year or longer depending on political, technical, and security clearances. Dawn Profit by Pakistan Today


Strategic value & implications for Pakistan (opportunities and risks)

Opportunities

  1. Connectivity: Rapid expansion of broadband coverage to underserved/remote Pakistani regions (northern areas, border regions, maritime zones) where terrestrial build is costly.

  2. Economic: Potential for competition to lower prices, improved redundancy for telecom networks, enterprise & maritime services, and new B2B revenue streams (IoT, energy, mining).

  3. Tech transfer / local industry: Partnerships could yield satellite ground-station investment, training, and possible presence of satellite assembly/testing activities if negotiated. Reuters

Risks & considerations

  1. National security & resilience: Chinese state-backed operator implies potential obligations or expectations for secure access to data, control links, or priority access during crises — regulators must harden rules on data localization, interception, and access. Reuters

  2. Regulatory complexity: Spectrum coordination, orbital debris mitigation, ground gateway siting, and cross-border interference need robust rules (currently being drafted). Financial commitments (license fees, USF contributions) in draft Pakistani rules may shape commercial viability. cyberworldinsight.com

  3. Geopolitical optics: Hosting a Chinese global broadband provider has diplomatic implications—balance between commercial benefits and alignment with other global partners (e.g., US, NATO partners) who may view Chinese LEO systems through security lenses. Reuters


Interesting / lesser-known facts & signals

  • Multiple names confuse reporting: the project appears as Qianfan, Spacesail, G60, and is tied to SSST — media use these interchangeably, which sometimes inflates or duplicates satellite targets in reporting. Be cautious when interpreting raw figures.

  • Subnational leadership: SSST is an example of powerful Chinese subnational (municipal) sponsorship in high-tech space projects — Shanghai’s municipal backing speeds resources and industrial coordination. This is a model China uses to de-risk capital-heavy programs. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada

  • Rapid testing & foreign pilots: SSST has been reported testing networks in Central Asia (e.g., Kazakhstan) and signing MoUs with foreign national operators — a deliberate strategy to validate services and secure early market footholds. Developing Telecoms

  • State funding plus commercial partners: although SSST touts commercial ambition, its capital structure and early investors are tightly linked to government industrial funds — so commercial economics may be complemented by strategic subsidies. Reuters

  • More Than Just Internet: The constellation is designed to be multi-functional, supporting Internet of Things (IoT) for agriculture and logistics, autonomous vehicle connectivity, and secure government/military communications.

  • A "National Team" Player: While SSST is a distinct company, it operates in close coordination with other Chinese satellite projects, including the Guowang national network, creating a unified front.

  • The Name "SpaceSail": The brand name evokes imagery of exploration and harnessing the "winds" of space, but it may also be a subtle nod to the use of solar sails or advanced electric propulsion for satellite station-keeping, though this is unconfirmed.

  • A Key to China's "Space Silk Road": SpaceSail is the technological backbone for China's ambition to create a "Digital Silk Road" in space, mirroring the terrestrial Belt and Road Initiative.

Final Word:

SpaceSail (SSST) is not merely a commercial competitor to Starlink; it is a strategic instrument for China. Its entry into Pakistan is a calculated and highly significant move that will test its ability to compete on the global stage. While it currently lags years behind Starlink in terms of operational satellites and proven service, its state-backed model, strategic partnerships, and targeted market entry give it a unique pathway to success. The battle for LEO supremacy is underway, and the competition in markets like Pakistan will be a critical proving ground, with profound implications for global internet access, technological sovereignty, and the future of geopolitics in space.

Recommendations for Pakistani stakeholders (high level)

  1. Finalise a robust licensing & security framework (PSARB/PTA): clear rules for spectrum, data flows, gateway siting, encryption, lawful intercept, and cybersecurity conditions before issuing operational licences. Ensure conditionality for any foreign operator’s local contracts. cyberworldinsight.com

  2. Vendor diversity & competitive procurement: avoid lock-in by encouraging multiple LEO providers (Starlink, OneWeb, SpaceSail) to bid for government and Universal Service Fund (USF) contracts; use competition to control pricing and service SLAs. Dawn

  3. Technical pilots & joint capacity-building: require technology transfer clauses and local skills development in gateway operations, NOC training, and satellite ground-segment expertise as part of any licensing deal. Developing Telecoms

  4. Strategic risk assessment: perform classified technical assessment on potential national security implications (link budgets, control link security, emergency access, priority provisioning). Coordinate with military, foreign affairs, and intelligence agencies. Reuters


Open questions & data gaps

  • Exact commercial timeline for SSST in Pakistan — media reports vary between company registration claims and mere expressions of interest; official PSARB/PTA registration/approval documentation would be authoritative but is pending. Dawn

  • Realistic constellation size & schedule — company targets are ambitious and have varied across sources (600 / 648 / 10k / 15k / 30k), so treat multi-source numbers with caution and use on-the-record launch manifests for verification. spaceanddefense.io

  • Commercial pricing & terminal availability — not yet publicly standardized for many markets; local partnerships will determine consumer pricing and subsidies. Reuters


Sources (selected, load-bearing)

  1. Reuters — funding and Shanghai municipal-backed status (Feb 1, 2024). Reuters

  2. IEEE Spectrum — project overview, ambitions and context vs Starlink. IEEE Spectrum

  3. SpaceDaily / industry reports — recent batch launches and cumulative satellites. spacedaily.com

  4. Dawn (Pakistan) / Business Standard / Profit Pakistan — Pakistan regulatory context and reports of SSST interest/registration. Dawn Business Standard

  5. Reuters / other reporting on launch of initial batches (Long March launches) and PLA/state media framing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The New World Order Unveiled: A Game-Changing Analysis of Global Chess Moves

  Subtitle: A ruthless exposé of war crimes, peace pacts, betrayal, rebirth, and Pakistan’s unexpected rise to global superstardom. “History is not written by the victors anymore. It’s ghostwritten by strategists with nukes, oil, and media dominance. Welcome to the New World Disorder .” INTRO: The Theatre of Power Has a New Script The world is not merely evolving—it is burning, bending, and being rebuilt . The old guard of geopolitics lies shattered like the ruins of Gaza’s skyline. The new architects? A former reality TV star turned president, a kingdom looking to dominate the Islamic world, and a South Asian nation once written off as a “failed state” now punching like a superpower. In 2025, the New World Order is no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s breaking news —engineered in backdoor meetings, airbase corridors, and underground bunkers. What’s being constructed is not peace , but a highly calculated, oil-greased, war-scarred New World Disorder . The world stands at a...

The Myth of the 300 km Kill: Why India’s S-400 Claim Doesn’t Add Up

On 9 August 2025, India’s Air Chief announced a headline-grabbing feat — that the Indian Air Force’s S-400 air defense system had shot down six Pakistani aircraft in a single operation, including an AWACS, with one kill allegedly achieved at an astonishing 300 km range. On paper, this would be the largest surface-to-air missile (SAM) kill ever recorded in combat. In practice, the claim runs headlong into the physics of missile kinematics, radar geometry, and real-world engagement conditions. 1. The Missing Evidence Problem In modern high-intensity warfare, major aerial kills are typically accompanied by: Gun-camera footage or FLIR imagery Radar track logs Wreckage photographs or debris recovery Satellite confirmation India has released none of these. Pakistan has flatly denied losing any aircraft and publicly challenged India to provide proof. In an era where even minor skirmishes are live-tracked by OSINT communities, the absence of even circumstantial data is a major red ...

Pakistan vs. Israel? One Mistake Away from a War Tel Aviv Can’t Win

Unveiling Israel’s Information Warfare: The Psy-Ops Targeting Pakistan’s Ballistic Missiles By Zohaib Ahmed, Founder – The New World Disorder In the ever-evolving theatre of Middle Eastern geopolitics, wars are no longer just about boots on the ground or drones in the sky—they’re also fought with tweets, fake news, and weaponized narratives. In 2025, amid the flaring tensions between Israel and Iran, a dangerous subplot is unfolding: the deliberate vilification of Pakistan through sophisticated information warfare tactics. The target? Pakistan’s ballistic missile program. The method? Disinformation seeded into the digital bloodstream of global discourse. Recent claims originating from Israeli-aligned digital ecosystems suggest that Pakistan is supplying ballistic missiles to Iran—a narrative that, while lacking credible evidence, has found unsettling traction on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This blog decodes the psychological and strategic layers behind this propaganda camp...