Skip to main content

From Kitty Hawk to Multi-Domain Kill Chains: Why Airpower is No Longer About the Jet

 By Zohaib Ahmed | 29 August 2025 | Based on Article by Ali Hamza

Introduction

When Ali Hamza—a decorated PAF fighter pilot—writes about airpower, it isn’t just nostalgia from Kitty Hawk to Red Baron. His thesis is blunt: today, the battlefield is won not by shiny jets, but by networks, fusion, and systems integration. This blog dives deeper, blending technical aviation insight, kill chain analysis, and aerial warfare doctrine. We compare lessons from PAF-IAF standoffs, Gulf War air campaigns, NATO vs. Russia in Ukraine, and China’s Pacific strategy—and draw out what the next decade means for Pakistan, India, and global airpower.


“Airpower has lost its glamour dogfight aesthetic. The Rafale vs. J-10C debates in South Asia mirror Europe’s obsession with the F-35 vs. Typhoon—but the real metric is how fast your networks close the kill chain.” Tse adds, “Aircraft today are just flying nodes in a combat cloud. Without secure comms, AI-driven targeting, and ISR integration, a $200M fighter is just a very fast coffin.”

OODA loop (Observe–Orient–Decide–Act) still defines aerial war. Pakistan’s 2025 standoff compressed India’s OODA loop through real-time ISR and EW disruption, forcing the IAF into a reactive posture. That’s why PAF, with fewer aircraft, managed 6 confirmed BVR kills vs. 0 losses—a 100% kill ratio in limited engagement.

NATO in Libya (2011) and Ukraine (2022–25): “You can have dominance in numbers, but if your kill chain is broken by EW or cyber, your fleet is paralyzed.” It links directly to IAF’s S-400/Rafale paradox: great platforms, weak networks.

“The Indo-Pak model mirrors Russia’s Ukraine failures: billions in hardware wasted because of incomplete integration. Both show that system-of-systems beats platform-of-platforms.”

International Examples

  • Ukraine vs. Russia (2022–25): Russia lost 85+ aircraft due to broken kill chains and poor SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses).

  • Israel vs. Iran (2024): Israel’s AI-enabled kill web shortened strike timelines to under 10 minutes, overwhelming Iranian defenses.

  • China’s Pacific A2/AD: China integrates J-20s, DF-21Ds, and space-based ISR into a seamless kill chain, focusing on denying U.S. carrier strike groups freedom of maneuver.

  • Gulf War (1991): The U.S. pioneered the first modern network-centric campaign, using AWACS, JSTARS, and precision-guided munitions to dismantle Iraq’s military in 43 days.

Comparative Table – Platforms vs. Kill Chain Effectiveness

Conflict/Region Expensive Platforms Kill Chain Strength Outcome
IAF (2025 Indo-Pak) Rafale, S-400 Weak, disjointed Lost 6 aircraft, no kills
PAF (2025) J-10C, JF-17 Block III Strong (AI ISR + EW) 6 BVR kills, deterrence success
Russia (Ukraine) Su-35, Su-34 Weak, disrupted 85+ aircraft losses
Israel (Iran, 2024) F-35I, drones Very strong (AI-enabled fusion) Successful strikes, low attrition
China (Pacific) J-20, DF-21D Emerging, robust Effective A2/AD against U.S. drills

Key Angles for Pakistan

  1. Asymmetric Edge: PAF showed that $50M J-10Cs with PL-15 BVR missiles, backed by data links, outclassed India’s $200M Rafales.

  2. Training Culture: PAF invests 200–220 flight hours per pilot annually, vs. IAF’s ~150 hours—directly impacting kill chain efficiency.

  3. EW & Cyber Integration: Pakistan’s quiet investments in EW pods, cyber jammers, and AI C2 loops matter more than new jets.

  4. Budget vs. Impact: PAF’s annual airpower budget is roughly $2.5B, compared to IAF’s $20B—yet Pakistan achieved 6-0 in May 2025, proving efficiency over volume.

  5. Global Future: The next decade of airpower won’t crown nations with the most aircraft, but those who dominate multi-domain kill webs.

Extended Strategic Angles

  • US & NATO Lessons: The U.S. Air Force’s shift toward “Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2)” reflects exactly what PAF executed in 2025. Pakistan’s low-budget, high-efficiency model is a case study for mid-tier powers.

  • India’s Strategic Blindspot: Heavy reliance on Rafales and S-400s without a coherent kill chain means India risks repeating Russia’s Ukraine mistakes.

  • China Factor: CPEC 2.0 ensures Pakistan’s access to Chinese ISR and AI systems, potentially giving Islamabad a sustainable edge.

  • Trump 2025 Doctrine: The U.S. under Trump has doubled down on kill chain efficiency, pushing allies (including Pakistan, post-reset) toward joint training exercises.

Final Analysis

Ali Hamza’s article is a timely reminder: airpower is no longer about glamour—it’s about invisible dominance. From Kitty Hawk to Gulf War to May 2025, the lesson is constant: platforms win headlines, networks win wars. PAF’s May 2025 standoff joins NATO’s Libya campaign and Israel’s 2024 strikes as case studies in kill chain supremacy. For Pakistan, the takeaway is stark: keep building the boring backbone—data fusion, ISR, AI, EW—and let others waste billions on platforms that can’t talk to each other.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Myth of the 300 km Kill: Why India’s S-400 Claim Doesn’t Add Up

On 9 August 2025, India’s Air Chief announced a headline-grabbing feat — that the Indian Air Force’s S-400 air defense system had shot down six Pakistani aircraft in a single operation, including an AWACS, with one kill allegedly achieved at an astonishing 300 km range. On paper, this would be the largest surface-to-air missile (SAM) kill ever recorded in combat. In practice, the claim runs headlong into the physics of missile kinematics, radar geometry, and real-world engagement conditions. 1. The Missing Evidence Problem In modern high-intensity warfare, major aerial kills are typically accompanied by: Gun-camera footage or FLIR imagery Radar track logs Wreckage photographs or debris recovery Satellite confirmation India has released none of these. Pakistan has flatly denied losing any aircraft and publicly challenged India to provide proof. In an era where even minor skirmishes are live-tracked by OSINT communities, the absence of even circumstantial data is a major red ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New World Order Unveiled: A Game-Changing Analysis of Global Chess Moves

  Subtitle: A ruthless exposé of war crimes, peace pacts, betrayal, rebirth, and Pakistan’s unexpected rise to global superstardom. “History is not written by the victors anymore. It’s ghostwritten by strategists with nukes, oil, and media dominance. Welcome to the New World Disorder .” INTRO: The Theatre of Power Has a New Script The world is not merely evolving—it is burning, bending, and being rebuilt . The old guard of geopolitics lies shattered like the ruins of Gaza’s skyline. The new architects? A former reality TV star turned president, a kingdom looking to dominate the Islamic world, and a South Asian nation once written off as a “failed state” now punching like a superpower. In 2025, the New World Order is no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s breaking news —engineered in backdoor meetings, airbase corridors, and underground bunkers. What’s being constructed is not peace , but a highly calculated, oil-greased, war-scarred New World Disorder . The world stands at a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pakistan vs. Israel? One Mistake Away from a War Tel Aviv Can’t Win

Unveiling Israel’s Information Warfare: The Psy-Ops Targeting Pakistan’s Ballistic Missiles By Zohaib Ahmed, Founder – The New World Disorder In the ever-evolving theatre of Middle Eastern geopolitics, wars are no longer just about boots on the ground or drones in the sky—they’re also fought with tweets, fake news, and weaponized narratives. In 2025, amid the flaring tensions between Israel and Iran, a dangerous subplot is unfolding: the deliberate vilification of Pakistan through sophisticated information warfare tactics. The target? Pakistan’s ballistic missile program. The method? Disinformation seeded into the digital bloodstream of global discourse. Recent claims originating from Israeli-aligned digital ecosystems suggest that Pakistan is supplying ballistic missiles to Iran—a narrative that, while lacking credible evidence, has found unsettling traction on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This blog decodes the psychological and strategic layers behind this propaganda camp...
Post a Comment
Read more